Deutsches Historisches Museum - Verf�hrung Freiheit. Kunst in Europa seit 1945 - Blog

19.11.2012
14:15

To show what really is important: Co-curator Henry Meyric Hughes

Henry Meyric Huges lives in London. The first contact with him is always with E-mail and it is soon clear that he answers his E-mail more quickly than anyone else on the Desire for Freedom team. And he writes wonderful E-mails at that. The team members who have not had a chance to meet him personally are enthralled about his British courtesy and understatement. We met him for the first time shortly before the exhibition opening. It reinforced our digital impression and that despite his quite impressive biography (understatement): Director of the Hayward Gallery in London, founding member and President of Manifesta, President of the International Art Critics Association AICA, and recipient of the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany. And he speaks fluent German. 

Henry Meyric Hughes during the interview

Q. Dear Henry, could you please describe your role as one of the curators of this exhibition?

‘I am one of the three curators. Monika Flacke and I have been working together for two years now, and earlier, too, preparing the Art and Power exhibition that opened in 1995 in London. So we had to develop an idea and consider how we could bring it all together. But of course we couldn’t. That was the worst thing about it—that we were always forced to leave something out—although it is all connected. If you consider such a time span, from 1945 to the present, there is a consistency and coherence. But hopefully, when you enter the exhibition you will sense that this concept played a role. And that the objects and pictures collaborate and interact with one another, and have something to say.

Q. You travelled around all of Europe to find the artworks. Are there particular anecdotes that you remember especially well?

We travelled together through some 20 countries. Perhaps the most dramatic moment was when we arrived in Sarajevo. We had an appointment with two curators at the Museum of Contemporary Art and as soon as we arrived they told us that the museum would close the next day. We asked why, and of course it was and is a very complicated political story. But the fact of the matter was—it was August I think—that they had not been paid since January. No one visited the museum; they did not have a cent, and were working without pay. We thought that it would make more sense to hold a public protest, instead of continuing to suffer, but unfortunately the situation in Sarajevo has gotten even worse. Last month we found out that National Museum is closing and there is no sign of a solution. I don’t know what will happen, but we still hope to be able to work with Sarajevo.

Q. What were the most difficult and the easiest aspects of planning and carrying out this exhibition?

The most difficult thing is naturally the self-discipline, when you have such a wide view of Europe. There are almost 40 countries. So you have to be a bit disciplined and think about what really is of importance. Not just for us, but also for the public. And always stick to the concept and to what is possible. We also couldn’t afford that, even if the lenders were very generous. But that was the most difficult. The easiest thing was the conversations that we had with colleagues. The colleagues were very friendly and supportive, which really surprised us, because we also had difficult questions for the lenders.

Q. What do you personally find special about the concept?

‘That its approach is not chronological and it mixes everything up. It is not about schools, it is not about formal questions, and it is not about substantive questions. One has to somehow extract some inner meaning. And that is not how exhibitions are usually organised. Normally the curators present such and such a painter, such and such a school, or a movement occurring in a certain country. But we really wanted to develop an inner idea, so that the exhibition objects would speak to each other when they were exhibited here in the German Historical Museum.’

Q. Do you have a favourite object or room in the exhibition?

‘A favourite object is perhaps a bit difficult, but I might choose the little house from Donald Rodney. This was an unfortunate man, who died at the age of 37 (I think) of a blood disease. But he made his art out of that: the depiction of a tiny house that he holds in his hand. And he built that house out of his own skin. This is so touching and emblematic of what we wish to express in ‘The Other Space’ or ‘Worlds for Living In’. It is not simply a direct statement, but rather a general idea—the human being and the possibility of existence. Rodney’s house is such a fragile object that practically flutters when you walk by. And yet this somehow is human and very touching.’

Donald Rodney
Donald Rodney In the House of My Father, 1996/1997 London // Tate, Großbritannien © The estate of Donald Rodney / © Tate, London 2012 Photo: Andra Nelki

What we didn’t ask:

Which object would he have least wanted to have to leave out of the exhibition.

Where is his work place at the DHM:

He works from London.

When does he feel the most free:

‘In the waiting room with a book—anonymously.’

-->

Wiebke Hauschildt(hauschildt[at]dhm.de)Trackback link
Tags: makers, henry meyric-hughes, curator
Views: 8120
  •  
  • 0 Comment(s)
  •  

Sorry, you must be logged in to comment. Please login or register to comment.

back

DHM-Home   |  Deutsche Version |  Contact   |  Imprint   |  EU Project Partners |  Supporters |  Facebook  Twitter 

Archive